Africa: Education, Development and the Third Millennium
By Dr. Ghelawdewos Araia
A
comparative and International Education
perspective and analysis pertaining to
Africa’s development is a
daunting task. Africa is vast (11.6
million square miles) and highly diverse
(with at least eight hundred languages)
and relatively disconnected in terms of
infrastructure, but Africa’s
conceptual and metaphysical as well
cosmogenic superstructure is incredibly
similar across the board and rests
on relatively similar mode of
productions and cultures.
Despite the
heterogeneity of African
societies, cultural bridges can
easily be constructed between national
boundaries. For instance, the Somali are
found through the major portion of the
Horn of Africa (Somalia, Ethiopia,
Kenya, Djibouti); the Mandinka are in
Guinea, Mali, Liberia, Ivory Coast and
other parts of West Africa; the Fulani,
by virtue of their nomadic life,
traverse the entire Sahel and are a
nation under several nation-states;
Swahili is a uniting lingua franca to
East Africans as is Arabic to the
Northerners.
Sometimes it is
not just languages and cultural patterns
that unite Africans, but rather
substantial similarities in social
organization. Whereas the Akan people of
southern and eastern Ghana are actually
related to the Anyi and Baoule of
south-eastern and central Ivory Coast ,
the Ewe of Ghana and the Kru of Ivory
Coast are connected by similar patterns
of social organization.
It is against the
above background that we must examine
Africa’s education and development in
order to meaningfully realize the
transformation of African societies in
the Third Millennium. In an increasingly
globalized world and the enormous impact
of the latter on the entire planet,
Africans cannot afford to pursue an
isolationist inward-looking policy, nor
must they simply emulate Europe, America
or other developed countries in
designing and implementing curriculum
for schools and strategies for
development for their specific nations.
In the 1960s, for instance, many
Africans continued [understandably but
not justifiably] ex-colonial educational
frameworks, and in the 1980s a
significant number began to shift and
adopt the American educational system
without critically examining the latter
and observing its relevance to Africa’s
development.
Due to excessive
foreign influence, Africa was unable to
feel its potential and exploit some
skills and talents embedded in its
tradition, to the promotion of modern
education. What we call today vocational
education, for instance, simply eroded
and replaced traditional African
apprenticeship. The latter were not only
schools but also cultural laboratories
where parents, teachers and students
contribute their input. As some scholars
like Onifude and Obidi observe, long
before the coming of the European, the
Yoruba of Nigeria “learned a variety
of crafts, trades and professions from
craftsmen and professionals through the
apprenticeship system” (Comparative Education,
Vol. 31, No. 3, 1993).
Another important
traditional African tool for the
enhancement of cognition (and which
fuses the affective domain), ironically
used by anthropologists and abandoned by
modern African scholars, is ‘participatory
observation’. As Margaret Zoller Booth
aptly puts it, “as is true in much of
Africa, traditional education in
Swaziland places emphasis on active
participant observation. This differs
from imported Western educational system
which are more abstract and often not
relevant to the child’s immediate
surrounding.” (Comparative Education,
Vol. 33, No. 3,
1997).
As a matter of
fact, with the exception of religious
education as in the case of Ethiopian
Orthodox Church teachings where the
Scripture has to be memorized , all
other activities such as tilling,
fishing, hunting, harvesting, cooking,
bee-hive making , tree felling, building
construction, painting, choreography and
dance, hunting and gathering,
handicraft, metallurgy, pottery, brewing
etc. are virtually learned by
participant observation. In fact the
motto of African traditional education
is “learning by doing”, schooling
beyond participant observation.
Africa was also
the richest in the knowledge and use of
herbal medicine but we may gradually
lose it unless visionary leaders and
scholars preserve this priceless legacy.
But, as there is global resurgence
to recapturing herbal medicine, Africa
may rethink and exploit its potential
and incorporate herbal healing in
medical colleges.
Africa is also
perhaps the richest repository of oral
tradition; the cumulative and collective
human experience is passed from
generation to generation, and yet
Africans were unable to intertwine their
folklore with education. In fact,
African schooling must systematically
infuse oral history as interdisciplinary
teaching tool.
By and
large, across the board in the Continent
of Africa, emphasis on the significance
of education and expansion of schools
was given priority although in some
cases the quality of education
(e.g. Ethiopia 1974-1991) was dismally
low.
While schools
proliferated, new curricula were
designed too. A good example of this
initiative is the National Policy on
Education (NPE) of Nigeria, which was
adopted by the Federal Government in
1981. It is the year when Nigeria
abandoned the British System in favor of
the American 6-3-3-4 system, that is six
years of primary education, three years
of junior high school, three years of
secondary, and four of university.
By referring to
Fafunwa, Coredlia C. Nwagwu, in The Environment of Crisis in the Nigerian Education System
(Comparative Education, Vol. 33,
No. 1, 1997) tells us that “at
independence there were one university,
one college of technology, no colleges
of education (only 280 low-level teacher
training colleges) and 443 secondary
schools” and “during the 1993-94
academic year, there were 38,254 primary
schools, 5959 secondary schools, 55
colleges of education, 45 polytechnics
and colleges of technology and 35
universities in Nigeria.”
Similar to
Nigeria at independence, Ethiopia had
one University College of Addis Ababa
founded in 1950 and throughout the 1960s
and 1970s, with the exception of Asmara
University in Eritrea, it was the sole
institution of higher education. After
1961, the University College became
Haile Selassie University and was
renamed Addis Ababa University (AAU) in
1975. In the early 1980s AAU had
branches in Awassa, Bahir Dar, Debrezeit
and Gondar; Alemaya College of
Agriculture at Harar, which was part of
AAU, became an independent university.
After the fall of
the military regime in 1991, some
colleges were upgraded, a new University
of Mekelle (initially College of Arid
Zone Agriculture) and Mekelle Business
College were opened in Tigray northern
regional state. Another private Business
College is also inaugurated in Addis
Ababa. However, Ethiopia’s endeavor in
the education frontier is meager
compared to Nigeria. While Nigeria’s
oil revenue might have contributed to
the expansion of schools, which Ethiopia
clearly lacks at present, it should be
remembered that its population is double
that of Ethiopia.
A similar
comparison could be made between Ghana
and Botswana. In the mid-1980s, about
1.6 million students were attending 9180
elementary schools annually in Ghana;
235, 900 students were
enrolled in Botswana’s
primary schools. While Ghanaian
secondary schools enrolled 768,300 per
annum, those of Botswana enrolled 36,000
annually, and while the University of
Botswana in Gaborone admitted 2,300
students, the total university
enrollment in Ghana (University of
Ghana, the University of Science and
Technology at Kumasi, and the University
of Cape Coast) was 8,000. But, while
Ghana’s population in 1989 was 12.2
million, that of Botswana was 1.2
million , and while Ghana has some
mineral wealth like gold and bauxite,
Botswana is the second largest diamond
exporting country in the world.
Egypt is another
important country that has made
significant success in educational
development and expansion of schools and
can be compared with the above mentioned
countries.
Elementary
education is free and compulsory for all
Egyptian children between the ages of
six and twelve; in Nigeria primary
education is free but not compulsory. In
the early to mid-1980s, Egypt’s adult
literacy rate was 45% while that of
Nigeria was 50%. The literacy rate
between the two countries is not a huge
gap, but the population of Egypt was
half that of Nigeria in the same period.
Similarly, in the
mid-1980s while Egypt boasted 6 million
children enrollment in 12,230 elementary
schools and 2.7 million in secondary
schools, Nigeria enrolled 13.6 million
pupils in its primary schools and 3.1
million in secondary schools. Egypt has
only 13 universities ( four times that
of Ethiopia), but they are a third in
number to Nigerian universities, not to
mention the 55 colleges of education of
Nigeria, unsurpassed by any country in
Africa.
Egypt does not enjoy the oil blessings of Nigeria and virtually depends on the Nile for its waters, it is nonetheless a leading African nation in manufacturing industry.
Education contributes to overall development, but its direct correlation to economic progress is complicated and there is no general consensus that endorses this conjecture of education as impetus to national development.
As indicated above, my interest in this article is not so much ‘education and development’ of respective African countries but their place in the globalized world and the possibility of catching up in the 21st century.
In Africa and the New World Order (African Link, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1998), I have argued that “the European Community, the Bretton Woods institutions and economic scholars labeled the 1980s as a decade of ‘Africa’s economic crisis’ and this orchestration became a sound justification for international agencies to intervene in the decision-making process of African economic policies.”
The external intervention in African affairs also affects educational policy. For instance, as Anthony Lemon observes, “Zimbabwe abolished fees for primary schooling in 1980, although she was forced to reintroduce them in terms of the World Bank Economic structural Adjustment Programme in 1987” (Comparative Education, Vol. 31, No. 1, March 1995).
For Comparative and International Education academe, the current globalization or new world order with its attendant ‘cross-cultural transfer’ may apparently signal the age of mutual interdependence, but on close scrutiny, the educational technology transfer may not be appropriate and/or relevant to the African context. In Internationalization or Indigenization of Educational Management Development? Some issues of cross-cultural transfer, (Comparative Education, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1998), Susie Rodwell extrapolates that “the international and comparative literature provides ample evidence of the tendency for the latest strategies from the West to be adopted in LDCs without ensuring their appropriateness and relevance to the different context and situation…. Whether we are concerned with MSD [school-based Management Self-Development] or other model of educational management development , it seems very evident that we need to improve our understanding of cross-cultural issues, in order to assess better the strengths and weaknesses of the alternative options and avoid the pitfalls of uncritical transfer.”
Africa’s educational and economic development, therefore, must seriously consider: 1) the relevance and appropriateness of cross-cultural transfer to the local needs of African societies; 2) strategies for economic development that are deliberately designed to guarantee Africa’s independent path and foster already existing regional cooperative endeavors such as Southern Africa Development Conference
(SADC) and Economic Community of West African States
(ECOWAS); 3) Africa’s potential as provider, and not recipient, of cooperation, communality and spirituality on top of the legacy of ancient civilization; 4) the necessity of conflict resolution, peace and stability as preconditions to educational development and economic progress.
The first decade of the Third Millennium may not yet witness the resurgence of Africa beyond underdevelopment, civil strife and famine, but the Continent may be able to lay the cornerstone of genuine and meaningful development agenda by promoting a package of development, democracy and education.
Tuesday, February 24, 2004
|